India 307 (Jurel 90, Jaiswal 73, Bashir 5-119) and 192 for 5 (Rohit 55, Gill 52*, Jurel 39*, Bashir 3-79) beat England 353 (Root 122*, Robinson 58, Jadeja 4-67) and 145 (Crawley 60, Ashwin 5-51, Kuldeep 4-22) by five wickets
But ultimately, England had left India with too little to do after Jurel lifted India to within touching distance in the first innings with his 90 and England were bowled out for 145 in their second – thanks to R Ashwin’s five-for and Kuldeep Yadav’s four – setting India a victory target of 192 with two days and a bit to go. They needed just over half a day.
Bazball is more than a “vibe”, it’s an ethos with a proven Test-series record of four triumphs, three drawn and no defeats – until now. But it was the vibe that kept England believing almost to the very end.
It was possibly why India were so wary, having lost three wickets in 8.5 overs.
But India have a proven record of their own, having not lost a Test series at home in more than 11 years.
On Monday morning, they were chewing through their target, adding 42 runs in the first eight overs of the day. Rohit slammed Anderson for six over mid-on to take his side past fifty, leaving them with 140 more to get. He and Jaiswal pulled out the sweeps and reverse sweeps against Bashir and Hartley as they kept the boundary count up.
Hartley drew Rohit out of his crease with a ball outside off which kissed the edge ever so lightly before sailing into Foakes’ gloves. Even without the edge, Rohit would have been out for 55 as Foakes whipped off the bails with him still out of his ground and the dismissal was originally thought to be a stumping before UltraEdge revealed a faint spike.
Bashir removed Rajat Patidar for a six-ball duck next over when his length ball turned from off stump into the inside edge and popped to Ollie Pope at backward short leg via the knee roll. It extended a poor series for Patidar, who has only twice reached double-figures and once passed 30 in six innings.
India went to lunch needing 74 with seven wickets in hand. Then Bashir swung the momentum England’s way with wickets off consecutive balls in the second over after the interval. He had Jadeja caught by Jonny Bairstow off a full toss, then got one to turn from outside off, beating Sarfaraz Khan’s defensive prod to take a thin edge onto the pad and into Pope’s hands at backward short leg.
Jurel survived the hat-trick ball and when he drove a full, wide Bashir delivery through the covers it was India’s first boundary off the bat in 31 overs, and took their task under 50 runs.
From there, he and Gill got to work, steadily accumulating the runs they needed. Jurel initially took the lead role in their union, reaching 32 off 70 balls before Gill, with 39 from 119, cut loose. With 20 runs needed, Gill launched Bashir over long-off, and then, two balls later, raised his fifty by clearing the fence at deep midwicket.
Jurel got in on the act, pulling Hartley through mid-on for four, and it was he who struck the winning runs, working a Hartley delivery off his legs as he and Gill ran two.
Jurel’s first innings was key to India’s victory, too. Only he and Jaiswal, with 73, passed 40 for India as they set out in pursuit of England’s 353, which was led by Joe Root’s return to form via an unbeaten century. Jurel came in with his side 161 for 5 and saw Sarfaraz and Ashwin fall before staging a 76-run stand with Kuldeep and putting on another 40 with No. 10 Akash Deep, who was making his Test debut. By the time Jurel was last man out, India had put up 307 runs and closed the deficit to just 46.
Bashir and Hartley shared eight wickets between them during India’s first innings and England were backing themselves to build enough of a buffer when they came back out to bat. But Zak Crawley’s half-century was the only contribution of note as England’s batters racked up three ducks and Bairstow was the only other one to bat beyond 20. It left India with a target that proved to be as achievable as it looked, with plenty of intrigue thrown in.
Valkerie Baynes is a general editor, women’s cricket, at ESPNcricinfo
